Theory of Emanation in Islamic Thought: A Comparative Study of Ibn Arabi and Al-Farabi
نظرية الفيض في الفكر الإسلامي: دراسة مقارنة بين ابن عربي والفارابي
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18042118Keywords:
Al-Farabi & Ibn-Arabi , Islamic Cosmology, Islamic Metaphysic, Philosophical Sufism , Theory of Emanation, TasawufAbstract
Philosophical Sufism is an intellectual form of Muslim mysticism that primarily employs reason. Al-Farabi and Ibn ‘Arabi are regarded among the popular personalities in this realm of knowledge. Al-Farabi, an early Islamic philosopher, did not specifically declare himself a Sufi, but he led an ascetic life. His works are often associated with philosophical Sufism, simply because his philosophical teachings share similarities with Sufi ideologies. Also, Ibn ‘Arabī is referred to as the Greatest Master, Shaykh al-Akbar, by his beloved disciples. He is regarded as the first to have introduced a unique and new dimension of mysticism and esotericism in Islam. This innovation later influenced Islamic thoughts and traditions for the past seven hundred years. Both Ibn ‘Arabi and al-Farabi contributed greatly to the field of Islamic philosophy, specifically in the discourse of Islamic cosmology. Hence, this paper aims to compare and contrast the two scholars’ philosophical teachings on the theory of emanation. Specifically, this paper aims to explore the impact of the Greek method of enquiry on the two scholars’ Sufi teachings. It aims to trace how they formed their theory of emanation. It aims to trace the claim of the cosmic emanation from the light of Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) from their teachings. The research method of this paper is qualitative, and its approach is comparative and analytic. This study argues that the emanative theory of al-Farabi views that the universe is eternal, while that of Ibn ‘Arabi is that the universe is not eternal. This study in this paper offers a unique comparative analysis of the theory of emanation in the works of al-Farabi and Ibn ‘Arabi, and showcases the interplay between the Muslim philosophy and Sufism. It revisits the concept of emanation within an Islamic framework, tracing how rational and mystical philosophies shape cosmological thought.
Downloads
References
1. Adamson, Peter. “Al-Kindī.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2024. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/al-kindi/.
2. al-Ashmuri, Khalid. “Ibn ʿArabī: Ḥakīm Mursiya.” Arab Journal, 2023. https://arab-j.net/16037.
3. Alidu, Shafiu. “Divine Whispers: Unraveling the Enigma of the Sufi ‘Yan Ḥaqīqa’ Movement in West Africa.” Tasavvuf Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi 4, no. 2 (2025): 3–16.
4. Andani, Khalil. “Metaphysics of Muhammad.” Journal of Sufi Studies (2019): 99–175. https://traditionalhikma.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Metaphysics-of-Muhammad-Andani.pdf.
5. Arif, Syamsuddin. “Divine Emanation as Cosmic Origin: Ibn Sīnā and His Critics.” Tsaqafah: Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 8, no. 2 (2012): 331–46.
6. Armstrong, A. H. “Emanation in Plotinus.” Mind 46, no. 181 (1937): 61–66. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2250032.
7. Brigaglia, Andrea. “The Fayḍa Tijāniyya of Ibrāhīm Nyass: Genesis and Implications of a Sufi Doctrine.” Academia.edu, 2001.
8. Chittick, William C. “Ebn al-ʿArabī, Moḥyī al-Dīn Abū ʿAbd-Allāh Moḥammad Ṭāʾī Ḥātemī.” Encyclopaedia Iranica 7, fasc. 6 (2013): 664–70. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/ebn-al-arabi/.
9. Dadoo, Yusuf. “Divine Love, Unity of Being, and Religious Pluralism in the Poetry of Ibn ʿArabī.” Journal for Semitics 15, no. 1 (2006): 175–220.
10. Fadhilah, Mubarak. Simulujiya al-Ishrāq. Algiers: Jāmiʿat Ibn Khaldūn, 2017. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/downArticle/327/5/2/144976.
11. Faysal, Taha. “Abū Naṣr al-Fārābī wa Juhūduhu al-ʿIlmiyyah maʿa Ishārah Khāṣṣah ilā Kitābihi Iḥṣāʾ al-ʿUlūm.” Al-Baṣūl al-Islāmī, 2020. https://albasulislami.com/.
12. Hasker, William. “Medieval Occasionalism.” In Occasionalism, The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Taylor & Francis, 1998. Accessed December 16, 2025. https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/occasionalism/v-1/sections/medieval-occasionalism. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-K057-1
13. Hirtenstein, Stephen. “Names and Titles of Ibn ʿArabī.” The Muhyiddin Ibn ʿArabī Society, 2007. https://ibnarabisociety.org/names-and-titles-of-ibn-arabi-stephen-hirtenstein/.
14. Ibn ʿArabī, Muḥyī al-Dīn. Fuṣūṣ al-Ḥikam. Beirut: Dār Āfāq li-l-Nashr wa-l-Tawzīʿ, 2016.
15. ———. Shajarat al-Kawn. Cairo: Muṣṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī, 1985. https://www.noor-book.com/book/review/421553.
16. Ibn Taymiyyah, Aḥmad. Refutation of Ibn ʿArabī. Cairo: Noor Book, 2019. https://www.noor-book.com/.
17. Janos, Damien. Intellect, Substance, and Motion in al-Fārābī’s Cosmology. Montreal: Institute of Islamic Studies, McGill University, 2009.
18. Lala, Ismail. “Ibn ʿArabī and the Theologization of Aristotelian Hylomorphism.” Religions (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/REL14081066.
19. Moore, Edward. “Plotinus (204–270 C.E.).” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. n.d.
20. Nettler, Ronald L. Sufi Metaphysics and Qurʾānic Prophets: Ibn ʿArabī’s Thought and Method in the Fuṣūṣ al-Ḥikam. Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society, 2003.
21. Oord, Thomas J. Theologies of Creation. London: Taylor & Francis, 2014.
22. Peramatzis, Michail. “Aristotle’s Hylomorphism: The Causal-Explanatory Model.” Metaphysics (2018). https://doi.org/10.5334/met.2.
23. Reisman, David C. “Fārābī and the Philosophical Curriculum.” In The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy, edited by Peter Adamson and Richard C. Taylor, 52–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521817439.004.
24. Seesemann, Rüdiger. The Divine Flood: Ibrāhīm Niasse and the Roots of a Twentieth-Century Sufi Revival. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
25. Siorvanes, Lucas. “Plotinus and Neoplatonism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Science and Medicine in the Classical World, 847–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734146.013.78.
26. Sparavigna, Amelia Carolina. “The Ten Spheres of al-Fārābī: A Medieval Cosmology.” International Journal of Sciences 3, no. 6 (2014): 34–39.
27. Tarabishi, Jābir. Muʿjam al-Falāsifah. Beirut: Dār al-Ṭalīʿah, 2006. https://www.noor-book.com/.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bahria University Journal of Islam and Society (BUJIS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
© Bahria University Journal of Islam and Society (BUJIS).
Articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0)
