The Proverb "Applicable for All Times and Places" Between Textual and Contextual Traditionalists: A Comparative Study of Fiqhi Interpretations
مقولة "صالح لكل زمان ومكان" بين التقليديين والحداثيين (دراسة مقارنة للأحكام الفقهية)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/s729dc10Keywords:
Salih Likulli Zaman wa Makan, Modernity, Maqasid al-Shariah, Textualism, Contextualism, Islamic Epistemology, Proverbs and FiqhAbstract
The rapid pace of modernization confronting contemporary Muslim societies has compelled Islamic scholars and thinkers to intensively engage with aligning religious practice and shariah frameworks with modern realities. Amid secular ideological shifts, the operationalization of the Islamic axiom "Applicable for All Times and Places" (Salih Likulli Zaman wa Makan) has emerged as a central point of intellectual discourse. While diverse viewpoints exist, this study categorizes the overarching intellectual divide into two primary currents: "Textual Traditionalists" and "Contextual Traditionalists." These factions fundamentally diverge on the conceptualization of Ta'abbudi (unreasoned devotion), the rationality of Shariah, and the boundaries of fixed (Thawabit) and variable (Mutaghayyirat) rulings. This divergence stems from distinct epistemological and methodological principles, particularly regarding non-ritualistic, explicit textual rulings (Nass Qat’i) such as Qisas (retribution), Hudud (penalties), polygamy, and inheritance. Textual traditionalists strictly adhere to the literal and manifest meanings of the Quranic text. Conversely, contextual traditionalists prioritize Illah (effective cause) and historical-critical contextualization, arguing that the practical application of text-bound rulings is subject to spatial and temporal shifts. Utilizing a qualitative, descriptive, and analytical library-based methodology, this research addresses the foundational motives driving both paradigms, the underlying causes of their deep polarization, and the ideal framework for modern Muslims to navigate this intellectual dichotomy. Ultimately, this paper seeks to formulate a balanced paradigm that addresses the demands of modernity while meticulously preserving the authenticity, heritage, and core substance of Shariah, reinforcing the true essence of Islam’s eternal applicability.
Downloads
References
1. Al-Asqalani, Ahmad bin Ali bin Hajar. ‘Fath al-Bari bi-Sharh Sahih al-Bukhari’. Beirut: Dar al-Ma'rifah.
2. Al-Bukhari, Muhammad bin Ismail. ‘Sahih al-Bukhari’.
3. Al-Alkhami al-Shatibi, Ibrahim bin Musa bin Muhammad. ‘Al-Muwafaqat’. Edited by Abu Ubaidah Mashhoor bin Hasan Al Salman. Cairo: Dar Ibn Affan.
4. Al-Bouti, Muhammad Said Ramadan. ‘Al-Madahib al-Tawhidiyyah wal-Falsafah al-Mu'asirah’. Dar al-Fikr.
5. Al-Marakibi, Muhammad. "Al-Hadatha wa-Tahawwulat al-Khitab al-Maqasidi: Nahwa Fiqh al-Sa'il?" ‘Journal of Islamic Ethics’ (Brill).
6. Al-Maqdisi (Abu al-Faraj / Ibn al-Jawzi), Jamal al-Din Abd al-Rahman bin Ali. ‘Nuzhat al-A'yun al-Nawazir fi Ilm al-Wujuh wal-Naza'ir’. Beirut: Mu'assasat al-Risalah.
7. Al-Sharji, Abd al-Ghani Qasim Ghalib. ‘Al-Imam al-Shawkani: Hayatuhu wa-Fikruhu’. Beirut: Mu'assasat al-Risalah.
8. Al-Turabi, Hasan. ‘Tajdid Usul al-Fiqh al-Islami’. Beirut: Dar al-Jil & Khartoum: Dar al-Fikr.
9. Al-Zuhayli, Wahbah bin Mustafa. ‘Al-Fiqh al-Islami wa-Adillatuhu’. Damascus: Dar al-Fikr.
10. Amin, Samsul Munir. ‘Ilmu Tasawuf’. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
11. Abu Zayd, Ahmad. ‘Al-Fikr al-Kalami inda Ibn Khaldun’. Beirut: Al-Mu'assasat al-Jam'iyyah lil-Dirasat.
12. Abu Zayd, Nasr Hamid. ‘Al-Khitab wat-Ta'wil’. Casablanca: Al-Markaz al-Thaqafi al-Arabi.
13. Hallaq, Wael. ‘Al-Dawlah al-Mustahilah: Al-Islam wal-Siyasah wa-Ma'ziq al-Hadatha al-Akhlaqi (The Impossible State: Islam, Politics, and Modernity's Moral Predicament)’.
14. Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah, Muhammad bin Abi Bakr bin Ayyub. ‘Al-Ta'liq al-Mukhtar ala al-Qasidah al-Nuniyyah’.
15. Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah, Muhammad bin Abi Bakr bin Ayyub. ‘I'lam al-Muwaqqi'in an Rabb al-Alamin’. Saudi Arabia: Dar Ibn al-Jawzi.
16. Ibn Taymiyyah, Ahmad bin Abd al-Halim. ‘Majmu' al-Fatawa’. Medina: Majma' al-Malik Fahd li-Tiba'at al-Mushaf al-Sharif.
17. Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. "Maqashid Al Shari’ah: The Objectives of Islamic Law." ‘Islamic Studies’.
18. Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. "Punishment in Islamic Law: A Critique of the Hudud Bill of Kelantan, Malaysia." ‘Brill’.
19. Khallaf, Abd al-Wahhab. ‘Ilm Usul al-Fiqh’. Egypt: Maktabat al-Da'wah al-Islamiyyah.
20. Lumbard, Joseph. "Decolonizing Qurʾanic Studies." ‘Religions’. [https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13020176](https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13020176).
21. Muzakkir, Muhammad Rofiq. ‘Dekolonisasi Metodologi Kritis dalam Studi Humaniora dan Studi Islam’. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Bentala.
22. Ouda, Jasser. ‘Maqashid Alshariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach’. Herndon: The International Institute of Islamic Thought.
23. Qesm al-Abhath wal-Dirasat al-Islamiyyah fi al-Jam'iyyah al-Ethiopiyyah al-Islamiyyah lil-Taleem. ‘Nafa'is al-Muhadarat: Bab Kayfa Yu'khadu Ilm al-Din’.
24. Qutb, Muhammad. ‘Waqi'una al-Mu'asir’. Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq.
25. Rahman, Fazlur. ‘Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition’. London: The University of Chicago.
26. Saeed, Abdullah. ‘Interpreting the Qur’an: Towards a Contemporary Approach’. Taylor & Francis.
27. Saeed, Abdullah. ‘The Qur’an: An Introduction’. London: Routledge.
28. Zaydan, Abd al-Karim. ‘Al-Madkhal li-Dirasat al-Shari'ah al-Islamiyyah’. Alexandria: Dar Umar bin al-Khattab.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Sahni Arja (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0)
